All Posts Tagged With: "writing"

A protagonist is someone the story revolves around. A Mary Sue is someone the world revolves around. – Idler 2.0

“This has to be the most selfish, male-depending, uncaring, manipulative, self-centered, pretentious, idiotic, whining little bitch-bag you will ever see in your entire life! And honestly, that wouldn’t be too bad a character, that’d be very, very interesting IF IT WAS INTENTIONAL!!!
The Nostalgia Critic, on Bella Swan

 

There has been some talk, some of which I have participated in (and am waiting on responses to determine if my corpse will be burned in effigy by certain fandom peeps), about River Song of Doctor Who fame.  She is a divisive figure, as far as I can tell, in that people either love her or they hate her with the fiery passion of a thousand suns.  Can you guess where I fall there?

The reason that I have for not liking River Song is that she is a big, fat Mary Sue.

For those of you who have not spent any time in a fandom for movies/TV/books, you may be unfamiliar with this term.

Wikipedia defines a Mary Sue as thus:

“A Mary Sue (sometimes just Sue), in fanfiction, is a fictional character with overly idealized and hackneyed mannerisms, lacking noteworthy flaws, and primarily functioning as a wish-fulfillment fantasy for the author or reader. While the label “Mary Sue” itself originates from a parody of this type of character, most characters labeled “Mary Sues” by readers are not intended by authors as such. Male Mary Sues are often dubbed “Gary Stu”, “Larry Stu”, “Marty Stu”, or similar names.

While the term is generally limited to fan-created characters, and its most common usage today occurs within the fan fiction community or in reference to fan fiction, original characters in role-playing games or literary canon are also sometimes criticized as being “Mary Sues” or “canon Sues” if they dominate the spotlight or are too unrealistic or unlikely in other ways. One example of this criticism is Wesley Crusher from Star Trek: The Next Generation.”

Continued

Tags: ,

Long Time Gone (no, I ain’t hoed a row since I don’t know when)

It’s been a while since I’ve checked in and sadly, not much has happened for me in the writing world in terms of production.  I am horribly, horribly behind on my word count for the year.

1) Get Your Words Out/Word Count

I am current participating in a program called Get Your Words Out .  You sign up at the end of the year and you pledge a certain number of words for the year.  Every month you log your production and they keep a running tally for you.

There isn’t a prize, much like NaNoWriMo, other than the satisfaction that you have met a goal that you set for yourself.

I set a goal of 350,000 for the year.  As you can see from the wordcount bars on the left, I am not even close to hitting my goal.  I am so far behind that it almost seems crazy stupid to assume that I will ever catch up.

For the month of May, I should be hitting 145,834 words.  As you can see, I am currently at 16,810.  I need to write 129,024 words this month to get caught up. 

This is a bit… crazypants.  But I am putting that as my goal in the wordcount bar anyway.  Because why not?  Why not set a crazy goal?  WHAT HAPPENS IF I ACTUALLY HIT IT?!?!?!?!  Could you imagine how AWESOME that would be?  So, yeah, going for it.

2) 80k in 80 Days.

In related news, I’ve decided to jump in to this additional challenge.  The goal is to write 1000 words a day, for 80 days, and complete an entire novel.  It’s a little less intense than NaNoWriMo  but still accomplishes the same goal- a completed manuscript.  Check out the website- they have articles from writes, encouraging and supporting participants and you can track your word count there in the comments section.  Not as organized as NaNo but I don’t think it’s nearly (hah!) as big of an event. 

I like all the focus on writing that we’re seeing these days.  More and more people are trying to learn the craft and hone their skills.

I know that there are authors out there, esp. published ones, that don’t like all the NaNo-type stuff.  They feel that it takes something away from all the hard work that they do.  But I have to confess, I think that if you can finish a 50k novel in one month, that you’ve shown some pretty serious dedication and hard work, no matter how good or bad the resulting text actually is.

Especially in literary circles, there is this level of pretention, this air of mystery surrounding the writing of a book.  Only super, special people should be authors.  They have special abilities and a different air about them and not just ANYONE can do it.

Which is a bunch of bullshit. 

Yes, it is true.  There are some people who have serious writing skills and anything they put down on paper is pure gold.  Others have to work much hard, polishing and editing to eventually get a product that is good and solid, that people will want to buy and read.  Others are terrible and no matter how much editing they do, a turd is still a turd.  I admit to all of that.

But how does anyone know who has the talent or not, until people start writing?  And who says that only certain people should give it a try? 

And let’s be honest- even when they write shitty books, there are people out there who NEED to write to work out their issues on the page.  I know that I have worked out a lot of things by torturing or killing people on the page.  And I have felt better.  Going abck and looking at the work with years of distance, I can admit that those pages were pretty  bad but at least I was able to get through that tough time and made it to the other side.

That’s worth A LOT  and I can’t stand the idea that some asshole would try to dissuade people from writing because “that’s just not how it’s done”.

Haters to the left, y’all.  TO THE LEFT.

3) Submissions. 

I actually submitted, for the first time ever, to a publisher/magazine.  Now, if you are a long time reader you know that there was a contest that I completed where my manuscript was submitted to an editor.  Well, I have never heard ANYTHING back regarding this and, to be honest and frank, I am SO GLAD. 

My ms was kind of terrible, including the 13 PAGE sex scene that I had written.  I have NO DESIRE to hear how terrible that editor thought it was.

But I was hoping to at least receive some kind of acknowledgement from the editor so that I could officially join RWA’s PRO group.  Basically, that’s for people who have submitted a full length work, whether it was sold or not.

At this point, while I did send off that ms, I am still not PRO.  And I have stopped counting that submission as a submission because a) no response and b) I hate the story.

Now, the submissions that I made in April will not count for PRO.  Why am I mentioning them?  Because they are the first pieces that I really feel that I can stand behind and not be embarrassed that I wrote them.

They’re two short stories of mine, both less than 1000 words, both weird and kind of creepy.  Bear says that one of them is more poem than short story and that once he figured that out, it was so much easier to read.  Not sure what that meant, for sure, but I’ll take it.  He liked both stories, which was a relief.  My greatest fear is that my husband will not like my work.  Weird, huh?  But so far, so good.

I am waiting to hear back from the magazine I subbed to.  They have a turn around average of 27 days but their cut off for their next issue was May 1st.  So, I’m hoping to hear back from them soon.  *fingers crossed*

And that’s where we stand, friends.  Expect a few posts in the near future on both avoiding Mary Sue’s in your won work and a listing of great writing podcasts that you should check out.

Until then, peace.

Never Say Never But Just Say No

My biggest problem is that I can’t say no. I want to do everything. I want to say yes to everything and be involved with it all.

I want people to like me. It’s almost a compulsion, this need of mine to have people tell me that I’m great, that I did a good job. That I am fulfilling (my destiny) their expectations.

I love writing stories and posting them on my LiveJournal because I know (hope) that I will get comments on my writing. I hope that someone will love my work so much that they have to gush about my interpretation of character or my turn of phrase.

This need to be liked (loved) leads me to overfilling my dance card and leaving me little time for myself. For my own writing.

I am a very active member of the Romance Writers of America- three local chapters at the moment, all of which I volunteer with. I am a board member for one. This takes up way more time than anyone wants to admit to you when you first get involved.

They tell you that it won’t be much, just a few hours of your time but it morphs into something bigger than you every imagined and suddenly those hours that you had planned to devote to your novel are spent folding renewal forms or creating spreadsheets for online classes. And you get it all done but you look back and you wonder just where your day went and why your word count on that novel hasn’t even MOVED.

But the thing is, when you get involved, people like you. They learn your name (in their e-mail inboxes) and they learn your face (from all those meetings) and suddenly, you’re part of the group. You are included as one of the cool kids.

Which is exactly what you wanted.

So you keep saying yes.

Continued

Tags: ,

We ought never to do wrong when people are looking – Mark Twain

Thank god, the writer’s block is OVER.  Man, did that suck.

I’ve been working on a novel I am currently calling “First Lady and the Dead Presidents.”  Originally, I had begun writing it in third person, mostly because I am not a fan of books in the first person.  I think first person is incredibly difficult to get right and too many authors don’t have the right grip on the voice so it sounds (at least to me) contrived and over-written.

That being said, I was stuck.  I had gotten a few pages out and had submitted them to one of my critique groups.  The consensus was that, while it had a fairly good voice and really great description, there was something missing.  The readers in the group were having a hard time connecting to McKinley, my main character, which was a major problem. 

She came off the page as bitchy and overly mean.  Her actions occurred without a lot of context, so she seemed flaky and selfish, which I guess she is in a way, but there was a lot more hurt and brokenness to her behavior that just wasn’t coming off the page in the way that I wanted or needed it to.

So I stopped writing and tried to figure out a way to make it work.

I had a fleeting thought to try first person but batted it away.  Everyone knows that I HATE first person- why would I think that I could do it better than anyone else, right?

Well, I started to get thoughts and feelings about this book that became more and more insistent.  Something was whispering in my ear that I needed to at least TRY first person and see how it went.  I was under no obligation to actually keep writing in that voice, the whisper said,  and I wouldn’t HAVE to show it to anyone, should I choose not to.  What would it hurt?

And then one morning, I woke up and there were paragraphs and dialogue just sitting in my head, waiting patiently to be pounded out onto a computer screen, all in first person, and I knew that I had to give it at least a try.

And, damn it, it worked. 

I think I’ve found McKinley.  Her voice at least, and I think I’ve found a way to make her connect with the reader, even though in the beginning she’s making choices that are all about her and her needs.  The whole point of the story is that she has to learn to let HER pain go and try to help others ease theirs.

Now, at least, I feel like the reader will see the potential in McKinley and not write her off as a selfish bitch from day one.

I have a crit group meeting this evening- the first one for a new group and I am WAY pumped, let me tell you- so I’m hoping for some constructive feedback regarding these pages.  I’m lucky that these ladies read my original submission so they will know the changes I’ve made and be able to tell me which version of the heroine they prefer.

I have to say, though, I can’t wait until I get to Carter, my hero.  I’m curious to see how he comes off on the page, now that we aren’t going to get his POV.  Maybe I’ll need to make this a dual POV story, both in first person.  Or, I could try her in first and him in third. 

I have time to experiment and if this has taught me anything, it’s that experimenting can be rewarding beyond what any of us can imagine.

I recover my property wherever I find it. – Moliere

It has been a while since I blogged here!  How totally lame!  Time to change that.

So, lots to talk about but there’s one thing that has been on my mind for the past few days.

The Cooks Source kerfuffle.  *sigh*  

Here’s one of the great articles on the entire situation that sums it up better than I could.  Please click over and read, then head on back.  No worries.  I’ll wait.

I guess this is less a kerfuffle and more of an EPIC FAIL.  This is a disaster for the publishers and editors of the magazine, as they apparently have been stealing articles from other sources, including Martha Stewart Living, Paula Dean and Oprah Magazine.  Silly, silly editors!  No one messes with Oprah and walks away clean.  NO ONE!

The thing to take away from all of this is that the internet in NOT public domain.  Material posted can be (and usually is) copyrighted material.  Do not use stuff that isn’t yours.  Also, the internet is not as amoral and criminal as we all thought and there are people that will fight for your rights as an artist and creator.  This is a good thing.  Judith Griggs may not think so but trust me, this is something that I think all writers wanted to believe but didn’t know for sure and now we do.

Of all the questions that have come up because of this recent volcano of FAIL, the one that really speaks to me is the idea of fair use and sharing intellectual properties via the web.  We all know that copying someone else’s work and claiming it as yours is a big, fat FAIL.  We also know that posting someone else’s work on YOUR blog without their permission, even if you leave their name attached it also FAIL.

Which leads me into a discussion about linking to other blogs in your blog.  I guess some people get finicky about that.  I have to say, I have a hard time understanding that.  You have a blog because you want people to read it.  You put text on the page because you need to get it out there and YOU WANT PEOPLE TO READ IT.  Why, then, would you get upset because someone else links to your page?

Continued

Tags: ,

Read this stuff. For serious, yo.

Here’s a bunch of blog posts that you should check out.  Some are writing related and some are just related to good writing.  Not always the same thing.  ;)   Anyway, check these out when you need something to pass the time, you know, when you should be writing. 

1)      FANTASTIC post by Jamie at Defying Gravity.  She hits it dead center and she’s right.  It’s up to us.  We’re teaching the next generation and if we aren’t careful, we’ll teach them the wrong stuff.  Check out her post and change your life.

2) Top 10 Motivation Boosters and Procrastination Killers 

3) The Way We Dress – A fascinating article at Dear Author that asks questions about what women wear, what make s a professional, why there is a double standard with men, etc.  A bit of a frustrating article but something that we, as women, should think about, esp. how we can change it. 

4) June and July book launches for Carina Press

5) Amazing post on the difference between reading as an adult and as a child.  If you read as a kid and fell INLOVE with the books and the worlds that you were living in, even if it was only for a few hours, then you need to read this post.  Incredible stuff. 

6) A Wish For Someone Else’s Daughter – This is just beautiful.  Words that I want to share with all of you and would  love to share with my own daughter someday in the future. 

7) Plotting Made Easy – The Complications Worksheet

8)  Plotting Along- this is a post about revising your work and how to get through that process and down to the good stuff that stays, the bad stuff that goes and the new stuff that fills in the holes.  Great post and great inspiration towards getting my own revisions going. 

9) 21 Ideas to Get your Story out of the Slush Pile 

10) Tips for Blending in Backstory

11)  Netflix Friday #8 -Zulu – I read this review of a 1964 film that has been out of print for a while but is now available to stream on Netflix.  The write-up at this blog is brilliant and made me want to get home RIGHT NOW to watch this flick.   You all should read it.  And then go and stream the damn thing on Netflix.  DO IT. 

12) Netflix Friday #7 – Invader Zim – BEST. WRITE-UP. EVER.  For serious.

If I really considered myself a writer, I wouldn’t be writing screenplays. I’d be writing novels. – Q. Tarantino

A good friend of mine, Shak, from Inspire the Grind, shot me an e-mail at the beginning of the month, freaking out over a discovery that she had made.

Apparently, Quentin Tarantino wrote Reservoir Dogs in 3.5 weeks.  Which is pretty amazing and actually explains a lot about that particular story.

Another friend wrote it off as not being that big of a deal, that Tarantino had probably been working on the story for a while but hadn’t officially sat down to write it out.  Which may or may not be true.  For me, that doesn’t change the enormity of the act of completely a feature length screenplay in 3.5 weeks. 

On the one hand, if you’ve been thinking about a story for a long time and just finally get the chance to get it down on paper, then it might not take you very long.  On the other hand, getting an idea and trying to work it out on paper as you go tends to take a lot longer.

Anyway, Shak’s idea is that we should try the same thing this month, along with a third friend, Bright.  Complete a manuscript, either a screenplay or a novella, in the same amount of time.  We’ll get together and share manuscripts and have dinner at the end of the time period.  Celebrate the work that we’ve done.

I think it’s a really fun idea and I’m totally on board.  Especially if there is wine involved.  (YAY WINE!)

Here’s my issue:  what am I going to write?

I would love to finish one of my screenplays.  I only have 10 pages of the 1814/battle of New Orleans screenplay that I was really getting in to in 2006.  I have The Highwayman, which is in dire need of a re-write so I can start shopping it around.  I have a dark (and when I say dark, I mean DARK) fantasy script that would be fun to complete, as well as a screenplay version of my Oren/Calla story that I’ve been working on for 15 years.  Plus, you know, the modern version of Robin Hood. 

Tl:dr – Lots of scripts available in my queue to work on. 

But I’ve been focusing on novels/prose in an attempt to get a romance novel published.  I’ve spent a lot of time working on that end of the writing spectrum.  I started my gay farmer story (and I’ve changed Alex to Xander, which feels better on the page for me) and think that this is one that could get some attention with an e-pub sooner rather than later.

I need to work on my novel edits to try to make The Drake something that might get sold/published.  I have Moving Bodies and First Lady and the Dead Presidents.  And, you know, the werewolf story. 

A lot of novels/novellas in the queue.  (The queue is very, very long.)

Do I shift focus from novel writing back to screenwriting, especially since this is a Tarantino challenge OR do I keep rolling with a novel type deal?

A script has less pages and less words than a novel but they can be much harder to write **because** you are limited in your page and word count.  Novels can go on for hundreds of pages (see: Stephen King) with florid prose and amazing description.  Scripts don’t let you get into the internal lives of your characters- the only things you can put on that page are things that can be shown on screen.  That makes it hella tough to do.  My point here is that just because it’s shorter, doesn’t make it easier to do.

This biggest issue here is that I need to finish SOMETHING this month.  I have a hard time getting things done.  I start something and then get distracted and end up with a pile of half completed projects that aren’t going anywhere.  It’s frustrating for me as the writer but also for Bear, who just wants me to get something done so I can start submitting and hopefully get published (and paid for my work).

So, whatever I decide to go with, I HAVE to finish by June 30th.

Here’s the question that I keep bringing up- do I go with something that I would enjoy writing more, even if my chances of selling it are next to none OR do I try to finish something that I might be able to shop around after a polish/edit in July?

Will post my decision in a few days, after I take a long, hard look at what’s in front of me.  What I do know for sure right now is that I need to get on it or I won’t be able to finish by the deadline.

Tags: ,

I’m not going to get into the ring with Tolstoy. – Hemingway

It’s been a while since I’ve updated about my own writing. Needs to change, so here we go.

The editing on The Drake is not going well. I had some luck with the first chapter but I’m just not feeling it. I’m trying to determine the cause.

Is it because I know the editing process is going to be hard? I mean, really, really hard? Knock down all the walls and just leave the basic foundation kind of hard?

Is it because I’m just not feeling the story itself? I’m asking myself some serious questions about my main characters and how I feel about spending 75-100K words on them. I have to admit that I’m ambivalent.

Am I just not understanding my characters? Do I need to do more background work so I can get a better handle on who they are?

Am I trying to do too much in this story or not enough?

Continued

On Outlines and Red Herrings – A Guest Post by DB Grady

Welcome to week 3 of the Red Planet Noir blog tour. This is also the first week that Red Planet Noir is available for the Kindle — something I’ve been eagerly anticipating — and I hope everyone with a craving for a good mystery and snappy one-liners will consider it.

In Alison’s last post, she described the importance of properly staging a scene, of metaphorically “blocking” before putting pen to paper. She describes this technique in matters of murder and romance. And while I’ve never written a love scene — and God willing, never will — her advice is spot-on for crime fiction. (As a general rule, Alison is always right, and don’t you forget it.)

Outlining has garnered a bad reputation among writers for reasons good and bad. Most of the snake oil “Write A Bestseller in Thirty Days!” books recommend it. That’s reason enough to shun the practice. Some writers believe is delays the actual (fun!) practice of writing, and adds a bit of staleness to prose. And Stephen King hates it, which is pretty much the final word on the matter.

I like outlines.

Like most authors, I wrote my book while working a 9 to 5. Like most authors, I like a good solid block of time to work. And when time is at a premium, nothing is more jarring than flying through a page of prose only to hit a mental bear trap.

“I’m going on a vacation next week.”

“Where?”

“Illinois.”

“Chicago?”

“No, the capital.”

“I thought Chicago was the capital.”

“No, it’s—” ???

Experienced writers would recommend adding filler text and driving though, but my brain doesn’t work like that. I need to know Springfield is the capital. I can’t rest until the details are right.

Red Planet Noir is a whodunnit. Until the last 10 pages, it’s not clear who the killer is, but the novel is filled with hints along the way. An intrepid reader can play amateur detective with every page, because every page builds the case or adds something new to chew on.

Really brilliant crime writers — the kind who smoke pipes and have the words “New York Times bestselling author” precede their names — can do this in their heads.

I can not. I’m just a normal guy from the Earth planet.

Before writing my book, I drafted a five page, handwritten outline. It didn’t detail plot, exactly — it never delved into feelings or motivations — but it hit the major settings and key events. The dots, you might say, to connect. To give a made up example:

Restaurant
* Greasy spoon
* Notices steak knives serrated
* Remembers victim was stabbed with serrated knife.
* Chats with waitress.
* Waitress hated victim.

This was invaluable for several reasons. Because it was important to engage the reader in the investigation, I wanted to throw red herrings and clues the mix. And once the outline was complete, I had a nice picture of a sprawling mystery, and the ability to make mischief. Circle one character’s name: “Lover.” Scribble in the margins of a different scene: “Fingerprint.” Somewhere else, still: “How did he know where the body was found?”

Next, I bought a multi-color pack of index cards, and transcribed each scene onto a card. Here, I added a bit more color. Like many writers, I keep a pen at hand at all times. Whenever a funny exchange or quirky detail or brilliant revelation strikes, I jot it down for later filing and usage.

The index cards are great for pinning the tail on the donkey, so to speak. This funny bit of dialogue I scribbled while driving to work last week would go great in this scene. This interesting tick would work nicely for this character. This is a really cool metaphor — and here’s where I’ll use it.

After filling the index cards, I move on through to the end of the story. It’s a very useful practice for spotting glaring holes in logic. “But if the butler did it, he’d have to have been in two places at once… I need to rethink this.” Or whatever.

Erudite writers with brains the size of planets will scoff at my amateurish reliance on notes, but it works for me. I think of the outline and the index cards as assembling a prefabricated Christmas tree. There are no lights, no ornaments, no personality or motifs. It’s just the nuts-and-bolts details. Because when I sit down to write, I want to make full use of every available minute. I want to be productive. And nothing is less productive than ending a chapter and saying, “Now what?”

Speaking personally, the prose can’t flow — the humor and the sadness and the tension — if my logical mind is fully engaged in a dilemma. I can’t be Kirk and Spock at the same time. But by working from cards, there are no dilemmas. I’m rarely concerned about missing a critical element, because that element is jotted on yardstick, waiting to be crossed off. It also frees me, as a writer, to go off on tangents without fear of losing the trail.

I can decorate the tree without worrying whether or not there’s a branch for the star.

Outlining also gets a negative reputation because many people go overboard with it. If you’re on page 20 of an outline for an 80,000 word book, you’ve probably got too much detail, and run the risk of killing the spontaneity. Treasure maps don’t list barometric pressure and windchill factors of the desert at night. It doesn’t list soil composition of the place where X marks the spot. Think of your outline as a treasure map. “There’s the cliff shaped like a horse’s head. There’s the cluster of cacti. There’s the old ghost town. There’s the creek with the giant rock.”

Add the desperadoes with black hats and snake tattoos when you’re writing. All you need to know is where you’re going to find them.

They’re probably on your index card. X marks the spot.

A final note: there are a lot of really expensive pieces of computer software out there that help with the process.

Don’t waste your money.

You can’t spread out a computer program on the kitchen table and rearrange scenes. You can’t scribble in the margins of your monitor. A pen, a spiral notebook, and index cards run less than a dollar, total. You’ve probably got them lying around your house. (Check that junk drawer in the kitchen.)

It’s very tempting as a new writer to do anything but actually write. And these elaborate programs allow one to spend hours and days and weeks and months feeling productive without actually producing anything.

Pen and paper — it’s fast and effective.

Now get to writing. X marks the spot, and that treasure’s not going to dig up itself.

D.B. Grady is the author of Red Planet Noir.
He can be found on the web at http://www.dbgrady.com.

Always know where your gun is and always ditch the socks.

You always need to know where the gun is and you always have to take the socks off.  True facts.

Readers are finicky creatures.  It’s a delicate balance to give them what they want.  Too much detail or prose, and they’re skipping pages to get to the next section of dialogue.  Leave out the WRONG details and they’ll put your book down.  How do you balance the two?

You determine where the detail is the most necessary.  The spots where I have the most trouble as a reader and as a writer are in action sequences and love scenes.  What do you need to do to keep these scenes simple and easy to visualize in the readers minds?

The simple answer is you map it out.  In the theater world, they call it blocking.  Where are your characters going on the stage and how do they get there, based on the props on the stage and the other characters.  Choreography directs characters around the stage and through love scenes and fight scenes.

Why is this important? 

If you’re writing a crime novel or an adventure story- something like Tom Clancy or Suzanne Brockmann, for example- and you have a fight scene, the reader wants to know where the bodies are, where the weapons are, who has what and who loses what.

If you introduce a bad guy with a gun and your hero has a knife, that’s going to be an interesting match up.  How will your hero (or heroine) keep from getting shot, being stupid enough to bring a knife to a gun fight?

You as the reader need to know where the gun is- in hand?  Knocked to the floor?  In the waistband of the bad guy’s pants?  The scene isn’t going to make sense if you have no clue where the weapon is, who has it and why it is or isn’t in play.

As a writer, this is even more important because you are staging the scene- the reader only really has the information that YOU give them.  If you fail to properly stage it and you forget that the gun was dropped behind the chair or if you fail to disarm the bad guy but the hero still takes him down and you can’t clearly explain why, you may just lose your reader.

Continued

Tags: ,